INTERPRETIVE POLICY ANALYSIS (IPA) OF THE TRANSFORMATION IN THE HEALTHCARE MODEL IN BULGARIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15547/tjs.2025.4.013Keywords:
IPA, Healthcare, Healthcare systemsAbstract
The Bismarck model was adopted as the official health care system in Bulgaria, after more than forty years of using the Russian Semashko model. This essay examines the failed reform following Bulgaria’s transition to democracy and the adoption of flawed practices that burden patients with direct and indirect treatment costs. The focus is on the functioning of the Bulgarian health care system and on whether it is possible to transform it from the officially adopted Bismarck model into a de facto American-type system based on direct out-of-pocket payments. By applying interpretive policy analysis and considering all arguments, viewpoints, official data, and interpretations, the paper highlights the errors in the organization and the attempted changes in the healthcare system, along with the reasons for their failure. Dissatisfaction with the unreformed system exists across all facets of health care - from the directors of medical facilities, doctors, and medical staff to patients. Patients pay for almost everything in health care, yet a significant portion of this money never reaches the attending physician. While the state claims that a reform has taken place with only minor flaws, the health care system itself is smoothly and steadily transforming into the American health care system. In a country with a low standard of living, high health care costs, paid by patients, decrease health status, quality and length of life negatively impacting the country’s economy both directly and indirectly. This creates a vicious circle that is analysed here using IPA.
References
National Statistical Institute, “Health Care” section.
Ivanova, A., Finansirane na sistemata na zdraveopazvane v RBulgaria – sastoyanie, tendencii, vazmojnosti za optimizirane. Godishen almanah "Nauchni izsledvanija na doktoranti", 13(16), pp. 455-475, 2020.
Dimona, A., Rohova, M., Mutafova, E. & dr, Zdravni sistemi v prehod. BulgariJa. Analiz na zdravnata sistema. Bulgaria: Health System Review. Health Systems in Transition, 2012.
Petrov, M., Sistema za finansirane na zdraveopazvaneto v BulgariJa - kratak analiz. Nauchni trudove na RusenskiJa universitet, Tom 54, serija 5.1, pp. 87-88, 2015.
Djafer, N. &. V. E., Nereglamentirani plashtaniJa v bulgarskata zdravna sistema. Bulgarsko spisanie za obshtestveno zdrave, pp. 11(3), 3-9 r, 2019.
Heineman, R. A. B. W. T. P. S. A. &. K. E. N., (1990). The world of the policy analyst.. Chatham, NJ:, Issue Chatham House.
Fischer, F., 1995. Evaluating public policy., Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Yanow, D., 2000. Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis. s.l.:Qualitative Researd Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Ivanova, A., 2022. The health insurance reform in Bulgaria –financing models and status evaluation. Economic archive, ISSN: 0323-9004-Book Edition 4, pp. 79-98.
PeattieL., 1968. PeattieL.34(2)(1968)80–88PengT., s.l.: s.n.
Terziev, V., Ninov, N. & Ivanov, I., 27-28 juni 2019. Situacionen analiz na zdravnata sistema na Republika Bulgaria. Veliko Tarnovo, s.n., p. Sbornik dokladi.
MF, 2005. Teoretichni osnovi, modeli i tendencii. Finansirane i upravlenie na zdraveopazvaneto.
Delcheva, E., 1998. Zdravnata reforma v BulgariJa. Ministerstvo na zdraveopazvaneto, Volume SofiJa, Princeps.
Social Security Amendments of 1965 (Public Law 89-97) – USA, Medicare and Medicaid
• U.S. Congress. (1965). Social Security Amendments of 1965, Public Law 89–97; 79 Stat. 286. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
• U.S. Social Security Administration. (1965). Social Security Amendments of 1965. Social Security Bulletin, 28(9).
• U.S. National Archives. (2022). Medicare and Medicaid Act (1965). Milestone Documents. Retrieved from https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/medicare-and-medicaid-act
• U.S. Congress. (n.d.). H.R. 6675 – Social Security Amendments of 1965 (89th Congress). Congress.gov. Retrieved July 30, 1965, from https://www.congress.gov/bill/89th-congress/house-bill/667
Academic, O., Out-of-pocket health care costs among older Americans. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Volume 55, Issue 1, 1 January 2000, Pages S51–S62.
Angelova, M., 30/2021. Vizionerstvo i zdrave: modelat "Semashko" i sovetizaciJata na obshtestvenoto zdraveozvane v BulgariJa (1944-1955). Balkanisticheski forum, Volume Jugozapaden universitet "Neofit Rilski", Blagoevgrad.
Davidov, B., Bolnicite v BulgariJa – makroikonomicheski pogled,. Bulgarsko spisanie za obshtestveno zdrave, pp. 5(2), 129-147, 2013.
Rohova, M., 2016. Chastni razhodi za zdraveopazvane i neravenstva v dostapa do zdravni uslugi v Bulgaria. Varnenski medicinski forum, Tom 5, broj 2.
Dimitrov, D., Bajmakova, M. & Popov, G., 2014. Razhodi za zdraveopazvanev v usloviJa na kriza. Ikonomicheski i socialni alternativi, Broj 4.
A., Z., Ikonomika i zdraveopazvane – poveche investicii v zdraveopazvaneto - po-dobra lokalna ikonomika. Zdravna ikonomika i menidzhment, Varna Broj 4 (74), 2019.
Dillender, M., Friedson, A., Gian, C. & Simon, K., Is Healthcare Employment Resilient and “Recession Proof”. The Journal of Health Care and Financing, Volume 58: 1–11, 2021.
Z., O., Ch., C., M., L. & etc, V. K., 2010. Are health problems systemic? Politics of access and choise under Beveridge and Bismark systems, Cambridge University Press: s.n.
Delnoij, D. M. J., Bismarck or Beveridge: primary care matters. European Journal of Public Health, Oxford Academic, pp. European Journal of Public Health, Volume 23, Issue 3, June 2013, Page 349, 2013.
S. Keremidchiev, M. N., Ocenka na korporativnoto upravlenie na darzhavnite bolnici. Bulgarsko spisanie za obshtestveno zdrave, pp. Tom 14, Kniga 1, 2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
